
Intent data is not a crowded category. It is an under-adopted one. When we talk to SMB HubSpot users in Europe, 75% tell us they have not activated intent data at all. Meanwhile, 84% of B2B buyers purchase from the first company they interact with. In that market, being first is worth more than being loud.
The number we quote most often: 84% of B2B buyers purchase from the first company they interact with. It matches what we see in our own deals. The vendor who starts the conversation sets the frame, the criteria and the timeline, and everyone who arrives later is compared against them.
Now picture the opposite. A key prospect is on your website reading a case study right now. Nobody on the team knows. Three weeks later a competitor calls them, and you lose a deal before you even knew it existed.
That is what missing intent signals costs: not a lower conversion rate, but deals that never show up in the CRM.
I often hear that intent data is a crowded market. Lots of vendors, lots of logos, lots of noise. From inside the industry, that is true.
From the buyer side, the picture is the opposite. Among the SMB HubSpot users we meet in France and Europe, 75% have not activated any intent data. Not ours, not anyone's. Most of them still prospect blind, from a static list, in the same time blocks every day.
It is the same pattern we saw when CRM first appeared. At first, everyone said "too crowded". In reality, adoption was close to zero, and the companies that adopted early built an advantage that lasted a decade.
In our experience, three things slow European SMBs down. Most intent vendors were built for US enterprise teams and price accordingly. GDPR makes teams cautious, often more than the regulation requires when the data comes from your own CRM and your own website. And outbound culture in Europe is still email-first, so when a signal does exist it gets sent to a sequence instead of a phone.
That means two things. Most teams are still prospecting blind. And the ones who move first with intent will win, because their prospects are not getting called by anyone else with a reason.
Two numbers from Sonik's own data. 50% of our pipeline comes from signals that were already in our CRM: closed-lost deals, dormant leads, job changes, website returns. And in the 1,000,000 B2B cold calls we analyzed with Katana, trigger-based openers booked a meeting 7 to 10% of the time, against 2 to 3% for pitch-first openers.
Intent is what gives a rep the trigger. Without it, the rep is in the 2 to 3% group, calling a list. With it, the rep is first, with a reason, and in the 7 to 10% group.
Think about what that does to the same 100 calls. A rep working a static list books 2 or 3 meetings. A rep working contacts with a signal books 7 to 10. Same rep, same product, three times the pipeline, and the deals start before the competitor knows the account is in the market.
Sonik was built for the SMB HubSpot teams who told us they had nothing in place. The signals layer connects to HubSpot and surfaces contact-level intent from sources the team already owns: website visits, job changes, closed-lost deals, dormant leads, call history, plus social intent.
Those contacts land directly in the dialer with the "why now" attached, so the first conversation happens the day the signal fires. For a European SMB, the whole stack is on the pricing page, without an enterprise contract.
If intent were crowded, 75% of the SMB HubSpot users we meet would not be prospecting blind. 84% of buyers go with the first vendor they talk to, and right now, in most European SMB deals, nobody is first. This week, pull your closed-lost deals from the last two years and your pricing-page visitors from the last seven days, and call them before anyone else does.